Thursday, April 29, 2010
2010 Playoffs: Ranking First Round Predictions
The first round is over and there are no doubt plenty of pundits weighing in on the second round, giving expert analysis on who is likely to advance and why (I will be one of these fools later today). But can you really trust these people? How did their predictions fare in the first round?
I think every time someone gives their predictions they should be forced to show their all-time record, or at the very least their record that season. So in honour of full disclosure I’m showing how my predictions fared in the first round. To make myself feel smart I’m comparing them to so-called hockey experts.
It’s hard to be overly excited about the success of my predictions considering there was very little difference between pundit choices. Everyone picked the Capitals, Penguins, Sharks, and Hawks to advance. Even the Montreal newspapers were picking the Capitals to walk away with the series. I checked both the Gazette (Montreal’s English newspaper) and La Presse (one of the city’s French papers) and only one writer had the guts to pick the Canadiens – Ronald King. I don’t know anything about him; maybe he has a history of mental illness.
Well, I guess he’s smarter than all of us because thanks to Boston and Montreal he went 7-1 with his predictions.
The series that had some difference of opinion (Devils-Flyers, Sabres-Bruins, Canucks-Kings, Wings-Coyotes) were still predominantly favouring the higher seed (except in the Wings series, but most people still picked them despite being the lower seed). There were only a few deviations from the norm here and there. For the most part everyone’s predictions looked very similar and the standings below reflect this. No one did terribly and no one was perfect (from what I could find).
That being said, my predictions put me in a tie for second place. PLAYOFFS! And for the record, I didn’t just search out the various predictions that would make me look good! In fact, I actively searched out someone who picked the Canadiens. This list is a pretty wide sampling of hockey writers from various media.
Here’s how everyone fared in the first round, including myself.
I think every time someone gives their predictions they should be forced to show their all-time record, or at the very least their record that season. So in honour of full disclosure I’m showing how my predictions fared in the first round. To make myself feel smart I’m comparing them to so-called hockey experts.
It’s hard to be overly excited about the success of my predictions considering there was very little difference between pundit choices. Everyone picked the Capitals, Penguins, Sharks, and Hawks to advance. Even the Montreal newspapers were picking the Capitals to walk away with the series. I checked both the Gazette (Montreal’s English newspaper) and La Presse (one of the city’s French papers) and only one writer had the guts to pick the Canadiens – Ronald King. I don’t know anything about him; maybe he has a history of mental illness.
Well, I guess he’s smarter than all of us because thanks to Boston and Montreal he went 7-1 with his predictions.
The series that had some difference of opinion (Devils-Flyers, Sabres-Bruins, Canucks-Kings, Wings-Coyotes) were still predominantly favouring the higher seed (except in the Wings series, but most people still picked them despite being the lower seed). There were only a few deviations from the norm here and there. For the most part everyone’s predictions looked very similar and the standings below reflect this. No one did terribly and no one was perfect (from what I could find).
That being said, my predictions put me in a tie for second place. PLAYOFFS! And for the record, I didn’t just search out the various predictions that would make me look good! In fact, I actively searched out someone who picked the Canadiens. This list is a pretty wide sampling of hockey writers from various media.
Here’s how everyone fared in the first round, including myself.
Name | Affiliation | Record | Wrong Picks |
Ronald King | La Presse | 7-1 | Devils |
Matt Horner | Five Minutes For Fighting | 6-2 | Caps, Sabres |
Paul Hunter/Kevin McGran | Toronto Star | 6-2 | Caps, Sabres |
Pierre LeBrun | ESPN/CBC | 5-3 | Caps, Devils, Sabres |
Barry Melrose | ESPN/Mullet | 5-3 | Caps, Devils, Sabres |
Matthew Barnaby | ESPN | 5-3 | Caps, Devils, Sabres |
John Buccigross | ESPN | 5-3 | Caps, Sabres, Kings |
Scott Burnside | ESPN | 5-3 | Caps, Sabres, Kings |
Bob McKenzie | TSN | 5-3 | Caps, Sabres, Kings |
Eklund | Hockeybuzz.com | 5-3 | Caps, Sabres, Coyotes |
Puck Daddy | Yahoo | 5-3 | Caps, Devils, Sabres |
Adam Proteau | The Hockey News | 5-3 | Caps, Sabres, Kings |
Michael Farber | Sports Illustrated | 5-3 | Caps, Sabres, Kings |
Chris Stevenson | Toronto Sun | 5-3 | Caps, Devils, Coyotes |
Ken Warren | Montreal Gazette | 5-3 | Caps, Devils, Sabres |
David Shoalts/Eric Duhatschek | Globe and Mail | 4-4 | Caps, Devils, Sabres, Coyotes |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
lawl at Barry Melrose's 2nd affiliation [Mullet].
Top drawer, sir. Top. Drawer.
Post a Comment