Showing posts with label Pat Burns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pat Burns. Show all posts
Friday, November 2, 2012
Movember: NHL Style Guide
The moustache has endured in hockey, much like the mullet, even during times when it has fallen out of favour with the general population.
Now moustaches are given a whole month, whether in style or not, all for raising money/awareness for prostate cancer
If you are growing a moustache for Movember and are having a hard time determining how to style your soup strainer, why not look to the pros.
The internet has plenty of style guides already available (like here, here, here, and here), but they won't tell you what is NHL-chic.
Now moustaches are given a whole month, whether in style or not, all for raising money/awareness for prostate cancer
If you are growing a moustache for Movember and are having a hard time determining how to style your soup strainer, why not look to the pros.
The internet has plenty of style guides already available (like here, here, here, and here), but they won't tell you what is NHL-chic.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
The Hockey Hall of Fame Needs Fixin'
For the second consecutive year the Hockey Hall of Fame failed to admit Pat Burns. Ostensibly, they did this because they didn't want to be accused of inducting him on account of his recent passing. This is so bogus because anyone with half a brain knows that when you have won the Jack Adams Award more times than any other coach in NHL history you're a pretty worthy selection.
The Hockey Hall of Fame needs to take a look to baseball to change the way they induct their members. I've had enough of secret Stonecutters style voting. The people making these choices shouldn't be afraid to publicly state why a player should or shouldn't be admitted. This is the Hall of Fame, it's supposed to be exclusive; it isn't a Friday night fish fry.
My latest post at The Good Point tackles the issue with less references to the Simpsons and fish.
The Hockey Hall of Fame needs to take a look to baseball to change the way they induct their members. I've had enough of secret Stonecutters style voting. The people making these choices shouldn't be afraid to publicly state why a player should or shouldn't be admitted. This is the Hall of Fame, it's supposed to be exclusive; it isn't a Friday night fish fry.
My latest post at The Good Point tackles the issue with less references to the Simpsons and fish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)